
A person steps into a life’s work. Leaving behind a rubble of false starts, then it arrives. The disappointment was with the sometimes snarky, sometimes “smart” world of conceptual art, art that could be played as a game, a complicated game which was a fun game to watch, to follow the stats, to know a bit about the players, keeping a box score-card as you watched, but really you wanted to be a player on the field, to feel you’ve been dealt in. It felt like being on the inside of something special to be an artist working away in a studio. And, as a youngster you wanted to play the game as it was laid out, a lot of indirection coming from the glossy art mags, dry ole’ Duchamp and beefy sweaty ole’ Picasso dukeing it out in your mind, but there was something subrosa. Some hidden call to talk about spirit and soul. The filament inside the bulb. To be in that world bringing all your on-the-job training to shoulder the wheel of ART along, felt like being in a WPA mural of heroic workers… working your way out of some cul-de-sac caves as part of the journey. If you were an artist you were preparing yourself to head down into some unknown glen. Being an artist can make you feel as if you lived in rarefied land separate from the world. But my connection with the living world had always been a source for sparking inner connections, growing up in a town with a slow river and a wild-ish woods nearby. “Lets head out, I’ve heard Tule Lake on the Oregon/Cali border is full of birds. Especially in the fall.” I like looking at birds. So did a lot of waterfowl hunters on a similar (but different) trajectory.
The Mt. Shasta watershed is centered on the mountain, of course, but surrounding the mountain is a low-lying sedge land, perfect for rice farming with ample water and also perfect for ducks, geese, and swans. It’s as though Darwin were at work creating a proof of landscape giving rise to speciation. This landscape with the tall peak flowing away on all sides, a dominating two peak volcano, Shasta and Shastina rise purpley blue to 9600 feet from the valley floor. A mountain’s mountain. A distinct shape easy to lock into the mind as a picture. At Tule Lake the view of the mountain is to the south and looking into a late day sky, starting in early November, you can watch skeins of ducks weave back and forth across the sheer light of the sky as it dips into rosey sunset. The purple mountain, a woodblock. Then, standing braced against the wind, at the edge of the water, 10,000 birds burst up all at once, filling your chest with a thrum. Rising up the front of your neck comes a sob, a chortle, some sound you’ve never heard yourself make. This is it, the only thing to talk about is this. And its been so all of my life since, striding to meet that leafy green heart of beauty, the sunlight going to white on a damp leaf. The laws of nature are compatible with the laws of love.The laws of nature are compatible with the laws of love.

I’d already gotten the call to do this, been called to this, to paint pictures, Its what excited me. I had already passed through the gate of wondering if I was on the right path, but I needed a refresher. The gospel song says TAKE ME BACK TO THE PLACE I FIRST RECEIVED YOU. The shape of the call wears thin after a lot of head-down work in the studio and classroom. I’d worn a groove in the pathway. “I’m a watercolor painter,” I had declared. But I wanted a refresher “A lot of work can be churned out, then shoved aside like a broken-down carnival parade. So, Papa wants a brand new bag. Leanin’ into a groove. It don’t mean a thing if it ain’t got that swing…I was at a standoff with myself. So listen, my “call” to paint pictures started as a joke

Is it worth the effort? Start with hardest to fathom—sure you KNOW its good (maybe because the fancy people say it is) The sly smile of being in the know through increasingly the sales and martketing department had taken over the tower of curated quality. Don’t get me wrong, I truly love the part of the mind/body that can turn art into philosophy, But in the studio it felt like a brick chamber, the walls sweating with damp, trapping the urge to make stuff, locked away in a hot vault, of cool, I know better. We were at the end of history, weren’t we? The Zero Point. What was there to say? TV and movies was all the visual information you needed. Painting was silly as Barnet Neuman pointed out with his Voice of Fire… You go, “What the…” Mere presence was the point, painting pictures like the Voice of Fire pointed. The existential moment captured, there is only this, this presence of color. OK, fun to think about and work out the puzzle of: what is this, this “my child could do this”, this so-called painting, is so reveared, and it’s latest auction price hovering in the $40 million range. This is confusing for all of us, but fun for the mind engaged in thinking about art to figure out, as I had started on a course of fighting even the notion of painting itself—a dead language, I assumed, with the prevailing language of minimalism ruling the roost, minimalism and conceptual art ready in the wings. So I said in 1970 for my senior in college, last class of my undergrad career:
I wrote, for my senior seminar art class (this is 1970)”I propose to move to Cape Cod and learn the art of touristic best seller watercolors and exhibit those watercolors at a fashion-centric, trend setting gallery in NYC..” It would be as a poke in the eye to the high priests guarding the holy sepulcher. Testing the notion of high art/low art. And, bringing the question of art and high-finance to the front of discussion. I wanted to ask the question raised by this “action” as we called conceptual projects. Projects which would ask and answer questions of value and quality; questions high on the conceptual agenda. “Is this any good at all?” Then 3 years later in grad school seminar I found my advisor had done something similar. Researching the top sellers at the Gump’s Art gallery, Steve Kaltenbach, tried to formulate a top selling painting using their database of what had sold. It was a funny art-world inside joke. But me, I just liked fooling around with stuff, and here were thought experiments, that actually BECAME stuff. This was just not done. Narrative was out, outrez, and, I want to do it in watercolor, the medium itself as cheesy and disdained as it gets. Fusty, a has-been medium, an old lady medium, a disdained lavender, queer-world medium. At least in my mind, the carnival barker, critic trading on his will to be heard, shouts in the glossy art mags, that art was not about stuff. Maybe Art was lifestyle, maybe art was an idea like say—have your name changed every month for a year, and have it registered legally in the courts as my instructor and advisor Ed Mc Gowin had done, in whose very class I had proposed my vacation watercolor project. Like McGowin, printing up the court documents and mounting them on a wall in his gallery, have Betty Parsons sell them, I would show framed advertisments, and the review in ArtForum. Hey,! whats the big idea? Exactly. Questions? Yes indeed. Identity and value on the docket at the “Critical Dialogue” court of what’s authentic.
So, there!!! I abandonded work on my project my project with a watercolor, actually painted while living on Cape Cod where I discovered painting was a kind of thinking, wholly satisfying. Several years maybe 5 or 6, I’ve waded through all this working stuff as thought and still, my message and my mantra remain the same: The laws of nature are compatible with the laws of love. The laws of nature are compatible with the laws of love.









